Jesus, Zacchaeus & Christian Cake-Bakers

canstockphoto16354235Apparently there are some Christians who believe that if they bake a cake for a gay marriage that this constitutes an endorsement of the event, and that being forced to do so is a violation of their religious freedom.

People of all backgrounds and persuasions have been weighing in, with Christians in particular arguing for or against and using Scripture to back their positions up.

In my opinion they are using the wrong Scriptures.

As Christians, we look to Jesus for our teaching and interpret all Scripture in light of his life and teachings, and there is a Scripture that speaks directly to this issue.

It’s the story of Zacchaeus found in Luke 19:1-10. Jesus is passing through Jericho on his way to Jerusalem. The townspeople would love for him to stop so that they would have the opportunity to show typical Middle Eastern hospitality, but Jesus is on the move. Nonetheless, a crowd forms and accompanies him through town.

Zacchaeus is a tax collector, and rich to boot. He has made his wealth by cheating the people of Jericho, charging them more than the amount set by Rome for their taxes. Like all tax collectors Zacchaeus is considered unclean, unfit for worship. His house is considered unclean as well, and anyone who enters it or has anything but the absolute most necessary dealings with Zacchaeus is rendered unclean as well.

Zacchaeus is also considered a traitor to the people, placing him outside of Israelite fellowship.

He’s rich, but he is utterly alone. When Luke says that he is “small in stature” he’s not just referring to Zacchaeus’ height.

Like everyone else, Zacchaeus wants to see Jesus, but the crowd won’t let him, not just because he is small, but because he’s not part of the crowd.

He’s not one of them.

He is despised.

He is a Sinner, emphasis on the capital “S”.

Zacchaeus rushes out of town and down the road where Jesus will be heading, and he climbs a sycamore tree. This isn’t the same type of sycamore tree we have here in the United States, but a completely different species that is found in Africa, the southern Arabian Peninsula, and Israel.

It’s a sycamore fig tree. In the Bible Israel is often symbolized by the fig tree. Luke could have said that Zacchaeus climbed a tree, but he specifically points out that it’s a sycamore, and his original hearers would have understood that it was  fig tree.

In a sense, then, when Zacchaeus climbs into this tree, it symbolizes his desire—his need—to be connected and accepted into Israelite society.

Jesus passes through town—remember, he’s not planning to stay—and when he sees Zacchaeus he calls him down, saying, “I must stay at your house today.”

Scandalous! The people can’t believe it! “All who saw it began to grumble and said, ‘He has gone to be the guest of one who is a sinner.’” (Luke 19:7 NRSV)

Jesus is on the way to the Temple, and he’s going to render himself unclean!

Jesus doesn’t care.

He’s going to ruin his reputation!

Jesus doesn’t care.

He’s going to give the appearance that he endorses Rome and its cheating tax collectors!

Jesus doesn’t care.

He knows exactly what he’s doing and how everyone is going to react, and he does it anyway.

Because he does care.

He cares about Zacchaeus.

He doesn’t care about what people say about him or think about him, but he does care about Zacchaeus.

He doesn’t care that he’s “harming his witness,” but he does care about this one man who has been ostracized.

Here’s an interesting note: the story climaxes with Jesus saying, “Today salvation has come to this house, because he too is a son of Abraham.”

Not “…because he has promised to make restitution,” which Zacchaeus has in fact just done.

Salvation has come “because he too is a son of Abraham.”

He too.

That never had never changed, no matter that Zacchaeus was one of those really bad sinners that society collectively had excluded.

He was considered “not a son of Abraham” because all the righteous people had said so, not because God had said so.

And that apparently offends Jesus. He doesn’t like it when sinners exclude other sinners and don’t want to have anything to do with them, as if the log in their eye is smaller than the log in everyone else’s.

We are followers of Jesus, which means we are to care about the things that Jesus cared about and not care about the things Jesus didn’t care about.

And if we can’t or won’t let’s at least stop using his name to justify our actions.

By staying with Zacchaeus Jesus did not endorse or support the injustice of Rome and its onerous taxation system nor did he endorse or support the practice of tax collectors like Zacchaeus of overcharging people who were already struggling just to survive.

But neither did he ostracize him. The people of Jericho had already done that, and it didn’t change Zacchaeus.

Jesus loved and accepted him, and as a result Zacchaeus changed.

So bake the cake, people.

Do it lovingly, and see if it doesn’t make a difference.

In you at least. And that’s always the place Jesus would have us start.

Image by © Can Stock Photo Inc. / lamich

Don't Buy My Book!!!
My eBook "The Essence of Jesus: A Fresh Look at the Beatitudes" sells on Amazon for $3.99, but you can get it FREE by subscribing to my blog!
I hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

6 Responsesto “Jesus, Zacchaeus & Christian Cake-Bakers”

  1. Sherry says:

    I appreciate your perspective as you bring Biblical history as the example….. and LOVE how you very simply ended with…..
    “So bake the cake, people.

    Do it lovingly, and see if it doesn’t make a difference.

    In you at least. And that’s always the place Jesus would have us start.”

  2. PurplePajamaMama says:

    I absolutely love the difference in this message vs. the typical message associated with this scripture. It also comforts and encourages me in my resolution not to be too legalistic in my life and in my walk.

    • PurplePajamaMama says:

      Ex. I had a friend who refused to go to a baby shower because the expecting mother was not married, and she was raised in the church and knew better. She felt that if she was to go to celebrate the coming of the baby she would be contributing to the acceptance of pre-marital relations which was against her personal Christian conviction. It really boggled my mind.

    • Larry Eubanks says:

      Thank you. I’m glad you found the post helpful and encouraging. I understand the quandary that some people feel about out-of-wedlock pregnancies and the message they feel it sends when they appear to be celebrating it. Shaming and shunning have not proven to be effective at reforming behavior. Loving them unconditionally keeps the door open to reform and renewal. Somehow we’ve gotten it in our heads that to be friends–or even just friendly–with a person constitutes condoning all of their behaviors and lifestyle choices. Most people don’t demand that of their own friends, so why would they think that their friends, much less acquaintances, would demand it of them?

  3. Brian says:

    Hi Larry. Good article. But I think a more direct application would be that Jesus would have no qualms about visiting a gay couple in their home. That is certainly a point with which I agree with you 100%. But if we take your application to the logical degree, where does that end? Should an evangelical pastor officiate a same-sex wedding? I think it would be quite the stretch to use the Zacchaeus story to argue “yes” to that question.

    And setting aside the biblical issue for a moment, doesn’t the First Amendment protect the rights of people of faith to make these decisions for themselves? If I’m a Christian baker, I may agree with you and decide that baking a cake for a gay customer keeps a door open and does NOT mean that I am endorsing homosexual sex, but another Christian baker may disagree. Should the government FORCE my friend to comply simply because you and I can make a biblical argument from the story of Zacchaeus that he should? We are rapidly moving into dangerous ground if you’re going to say “yes” to that.

    As always, I appreciate your thoughtfulness, even if I don’t fully agree with you on this.

    And for anyone who may jump on my comments…let me clearly state (though I shouldn’t have to – but in this day and age, I sadly do) that I deplore gay-bashing. I’ve preached and written against such bigotry routinely. But I do not believe that disagreement or even disapproval necessarily equates with hatred or homophobia. Sadly, we’ve lost those distinctions in our culture today.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Like A Slave - Larry Eubanks | Larry Eubanks - […] He doesn’t with Zacchaeus the tax collector, nor with Simon the Pharisee, nor with Judas the betrayer or Peter…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *